(G)SCHEME BY EUPHEMISMS

    a. Plaintiffs repeat and reallege the allegations contained in paragraphs 1 to 36 of this complaint as fully as if set forth here.
    b. WA Bar Members have created a parallel set of substantive laws under which citizens are manipulate and Bar associates escape accountability. These ‘parallel laws’ are based upon euphemisms. These euphemistic laws employ terms such as “error” in place of “illegal, lie, prejudice, bias”; or “abuse of discretion” in place of “official misconduct”; and “deference to” in place of “bias, prejudice”; “reverse and remand” in place of “intentionally delay, incompetence, fraud upon the court, and so on.

    These euphemistic laws unlawfully established by WA State Bar associates, in whatever government office they occupy, render statutory laws irrelevant. This scheme is to protect judges from violations of their oath mandated by Article 4, Sec 28 to “faithfully and impartially discharge the duties of judge” or to protect their colleagues of the Bar Associates from violations of their oath mandated by RCW 2.48.210, to “employ for the purpose of maintaining the causes confided to me such means only as are consistent with truth and honor, and will never seek to mislead the judge or jury by any artifice or false statement of fact or law”. Such euphemistic laws circumvent statutory laws such as RCW 9A.72 – Perjury, RCW 9A.80 – Official Misconduct, RCW 42.20 – Misconduct by public officers, and many more.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Visitors since August 2016

wordpress stat
Back to Top
Social Media Auto Publish Powered By : XYZScripts.com