(C) COMMISSION ON JUDICIAL CONDUCT DISCIPLINARY SCHEME

  • The executive director, who is a member of the “enterprise”, misappropriates government funds by virtue of receiving a salary to perform a duty intended to protect citizens from judicial misconduct, instead dismisses all citizen grievances filed against judges for breaches of law and ethical duties
  • The commission itself is a contradiction in purpose — judges sit in judgment of their own conduct by being board members. See Article 4, sec. 32. and RCW 2.16.020. The “independence” label given the CJC is a blatant lie and fraud upon the people.
  • 1 Comment

    Leave a Reply

    Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

    Visitors since August 2016

    wordpress stat
    Back to Top
    Social Media Auto Publish Powered By : XYZScripts.com