Will Bill Scheidler be targeted for arrest, or worse?

Today I filed my amended complaint in the US District Court of D.C. in which I quote Abraham Lincoln. (page 4) This quote may be viewed, by the defendants, who are lawyers and judges, as a threat against them. If that proves to be the case I hope you’ll publicize their retaliation.

As you’ll see by reading the included complaint, all I’m asking for, and have been asking for, is for my “inviolate right to a civil trial by jury”. However, because lawyers and judges are involved in the controversy I have been denied these fundamental rights. These rights are America’s most cherished institutions — the right of petition and right to a jury. And these institutions – America’s Institutions – have been commandeered by lawyers and judges. They are the NEW Government. They have decided that they shall DECIDE EVERYTHING. We are all at risk from their brazen claim of power. The question is, how far will they go and to what extent will they push individuals to the breaking-point?

Link to Amended Complaint


  1. and next time you do a petition at whitehouse.gov to return the judiciary to we the people, coordinate with me and grassroots groups so we can simultaneously hit our social networks at the same time. sara and i are growing every day.

    • I’m ready to do a next one (petition to WH.org), or I’ll work to add names to a petition you do. The first 150 names are the hardest (smile). BTY Judge Boasberg ruled to “strike” my amended complaint claiming the case was closed. However the order dismissing the original complaint was “without prejudice”. WTF … is “case closed” a new definition for “without prejudice”?

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.