How bad is the corruption within the US judiciary? According to Dr. Richard Cordero, Esq., Ph.D., University of Cambridge, England, M.B.A., University of Michigan Business School, D.E.A., La Sorbonne, Paris, and founder of Judicial Discipline Reform, New York City, http://www.Judicial- Discipline-Reform.org, it seems only the Russian government can save the people of the United States from the corruption running throughout the US judiciary.
Dr. Cordero has studied the wrongdoing by federal judges over the course of 228 years and notes that over that period of time only 8 judges have been impeached and removed from the bench. This finding corresponds to a recent Rassmussen poll that finds only 37% of those polled believe judges are fair and guided by the law. Fifty four percent (54%) believe politics influence judicial decisions.
Dr. Cordero has no faith in Congress taking any steps to reign in judicial corruption. In fact, Dr. Cordero believes judicial corruption is directly tied to government corruption overall. In a quid-pro-quo scheme, each branch of government ‘looks the other way’ to allow corruption to run unchecked and unaccountably throughout our government. As we say here at www.corruptwash.com, ‘at the core of our rotten government you’ll find lawyers’.
Dr. Cordero is seeking help from Russia in addressing corruption within our US judicial system based in the adage “The enemy of my enemy is my friend.” A copy of his letter to high-ranking Russian officials is posted verbatim below.
Mr. Denis V. Gonchar
Minister-Counselor and Deputy Chief of Mission
Chargé d’Affaires ad interim
Embassy of the Russian Federation to the U.S.A.
2650 Wisconsin Ave., NW
Washington, DC 20007
The Hon. Consul General Igor L. Golubovskiy
Consulate General of the Russian Federation in NY
9 East 91st Street
New York, NY 10128
Dear Messrs. Gonchar and Golubovskiy,
This is a proposal for the Russian government to use its Information Technology (IT) prowess to expose how the most powerful American government officers, the life-tenured unaccountable federal judges, who dispose of people’s property and even suspended President Trump’s Muslim travel ban, risklessly:
a. engage in financial wrongdoing(*>jur:102§a, OL:154¶3) using their IT network and/or that of intelligence entities dependent on their grant of their secret requests for secret orders of surveillance under the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act(*>OL:20fn5); and
b. silence their critics, the Advocates of Honest Judiciaries, by committing the federal crime(*>OL:20¶¶11, 12) of intercepting their communications(jur:105§b).
Your government could achieve through this exposure what it failed to through its meddling with our presidential election: create a crisis of confidence of the people in the institutions duty-bound to uphold the law and turn public attention inward and away from Russia.
* † NOTE: The materials corresponding to the (blue text references) are found in my study of judges and their judiciaries, titled and downloadable thus:
Exposing Judges’ Unaccountability and
Consequent Riskless Wrongdoing:
Pioneering the news and publishing field of
judicial unaccountability reporting* †
* Volume 1: http://Judicial-Discipline- Reform.org/OL/DrRCordero- Honest_Jud_Advocates.pdf >all prefixes:page number up to OL:393
† Volume 2: http://Judicial-Discipline- Reform.org/OL2/DrRCordero- Honest_Jud_Advocates.pdf >from OL2:394
NOTE: Each of these volumes is too big to be emailed. Accordingly, they take minutes to download, which requires patience. However, if by clicking on either of those links nothing downloads, then copy one link at a time, paste it in the search box of your browser, press “enter”, and wait for the volume to download.
The Advocates would achieve what we have failed to for the last 228 years since the creation of the Federal Judiciary in 1789, during which period only 8 federal judges have been impeached and removed(jur:21§1), as they dismiss 99.8% of complaints against them: to expose the connivance between politicians and their appointed judges.
Politicians hold judges unaccountable to avoid being retaliated against by them, e.g., judges may declare their laws implementing their legislative agenda unconstitutional, as happened with parts of the President’s Muslim travel ban(†>OL2:569¶¶13-16; 541 2nd-3rd¶¶).
The exposure could set off a process that attains the Advocates’ objective of judicial reform that empowers We the People to hold judges accountable and liable to compensate the victims of their wrongdoing.
Russia would benefit from an America in domestic turmoil where the People demanded greater public accountability, no Judges Above the Law –even compelling a constitutional convention(†>OL2:517¶11)–, and concentration of attention and resources on improving the People’s lives, away from policing the world.
By contrast, your government’s ordered reduction of American diplomats in Russia only causes a logistical inconvenience, whereby fewer of them have to do the same or less.
The probable cause to believe that judges are intercepting Advocates’ communications is laid out at †>OL2:476, 425, 405§§B-C, 395; *>OL:19fn2; and shown by the current flagrant manifestation:
a. After my article with a realistic strategy for turning the issue of unaccountable judges’ wrongdoing into a key one of the 2018 mid-term elections was posted to my website at http://www.Judicial- Discipline-Reform.org, the daily number of new subscribers –not just visitors– to it, who some days had exceeded 110, was blocked in a week to zero on July 29! Up to then, 22,961 visitors had subscribed in less than 2 years.
The ones most interested in silencing me, judges, can reasonably be suspected of having blocked subscriptions to my website or even access to it.
Your exposure of judges’ wrongdoing through the type of IT investigation illustrated below would provoke public outrage more intense than that arising from Edward Snowden’s revelations of the National Security Agency (NSA)’s illegal dragnet collection of only the metadata of phone calls between scores of millions of people, but not the contents of their conversations(†>OL2:525§H).
However, committing contents-based interception of communications(OL2:583§3, 526¶56) deprives the People of their birthrights: “freedom of speech, or of the press, or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances”, guaranteed by the 1st Amendment to our Constitution(*>jur:22fn12b).
I respectfully request that you invite me to your office to discuss the details of this proposal.
Dare trigger history!(*>jur:7§5)…and you may enter it.
Dr. Richard Cordero, Esq.
Judicial Discipline Reform
New York City
Dr.Richard.Cordero_Esq@verizon .net, DrRCordero@Judicial- Discipline-Reform.org, Dr.Richard.Cordero.Esq@cantab. net Corderoric@yahoo.com