Today Bill Scheidler filed Ethics Complaints against Representative Jesse Young, Representative Michelle Caldier, Senator Jan Angel and Kitsap Superior Court Judge, Kevin Hull. Scheidler alleges Judge Kevin Hull is using his public office to retaliate against citizens who expose government corruption.
Scheidler says that he went to his legislators, Young, Caldier and Angel, with documents that prove Kevin Hull is misusing his public office and violating the laws that apply to judges so as to punish citizens for exposing government corruption. According to Scheidler neither Young, Caldier nor Angel showed any concern for such misconduct by government officials – particularly officials in the judicial branch.
Scheidler claims that self-regulation, which characterizes the judicial branch/ aka, the Bar, is an unconstitutional grant of a “privilege” no citizen enjoys, and leads to an unconstitutional grant of “immunity” which judges bestow upon themselves and their colleagues of the Bar. Such “privileges and immunities” are “PROHIBITED” by Washington’s constitution Article 1, Sections 8, 12, and 28 and the State legislature is negligent in performing their obligations to address official misconduct. Said another way, the legislature has the power to address judicial overreach under Washington’s constitution Article 4, Section 9. Failure to do so is tantamount to repealing Article 1, Sections 8, 12, and 28 and rendering most other constitutional protections irrelevant.
An “ethics complaint” is an ‘administrative’ pathway to resolve Scheidler’s issues. Failure to achieve a remedy, Scheidler intends to file a lawsuit against his state legislators for breach of duty and aiding and abetting in unconstitutional and unlawful conduct by Bar associates who occupy judicial, legislative, executive, administrative offices and sit on ethics boards and legislative committees under their special “privileges and self-bestowed immunities”.
Scheidler sees a constitutional crises should a lawsuit be instituted — under law a judge cannot sit on a case in which he/she has an interest. Here the case would be judicial overreaching concerning the powers and laws that apply to judges — clearly a judge has an interest in the laws that apply to judges and must, by law, disqualify. Where do you find a “disinterested judge” when the issues concern judges violating the laws that apply to judges?
The entire prospect of such a lawsuit and the “quid pro quo” motives involved raise huge issues of “fairness” and spotlight how damaging to our confidence in our government when the legislature, particularly Young, Caldier and Angel, fails to address judicial corruption.
Scheidler says he has been,
victimized by a legal system that has replaced its duty to “truth and honor” with greed, retribution, intimidation as it commits criminal acts of perjury, extortion and engages in other despicable conduct.
At the center of Scheidler’s troubles is Washington State’s constitutional provision, Article 7, Section 10, which was passed by the people to assist retired/disabled individuals pay local levies (taxes). These local levies are voted upon all homeowners by the majority of the residents. Much of these “voter imposed taxes” are for county extras such as county employee perks and benefits.
When I discovered county employees were misrepresenting this Constitutional program so as to “disqualify” applicants and deny those who have a legitimate claim to their constitutional help, I made a simple request to those county employees … please correct their misrepresentations concerning this constitutional program and use the statutory language as the law requires. The law the County misrepresents in RCW 84.36.383. They refused!
At the time I didn’t know that this “defrauding” of retired/disabled individuals was a practice throughout the state. Nor did I realize that my discovery of how their scheme works involves significant and adverse financial consequence to all the counties of WA, including the insurers who insure the counties. This huge liability to the counties risk-pool funds is the motive for the government “cover-up”.
This is when the “legal system” displayed its true character. Rather than coming to the rescue of the retired/disabled citizen, and equally important, to rescue WA State’s Constitution and its laws from the criminal acts of greedy county employees, it is clear the “legal system” is at the center of the fraud, has established a “protection racket” to insure people like me who discover these crimes are silenced, and utilize methods to ruin anyone who does the right thing to correct a wrong.
In fact, the “legal system” has a vested interest in more crime, more controversy, more pain and suffering as these hardships translate directly into “revenue and profits” for law firms and lawyers.
This is the “nutshell version” of my story and how my reporting of criminal conduct to our trusted legislators and “legal establishment” has ruined me.
It is 17 years that document one corrupt act upon another to hide corruption, incompetence, negligence and retaliation against those who seek to hold government officials accountable. And at the center of our corrupt government are lawyers (i.e., the Washington State Bar). The Bar has its associates in EVERY BRANCH of government and on most all decision-making roles. This ‘commandeering of our government by associates of a judicial agency’ provides the means, opportunity and motives to protect government corruption at the expense of citizens life, liberty and property.