Who is Anne Giroux? Well…. in a paragraph.
K.K., Anne’s child, was born with a heart condition that was not diagnosed until years later when he, in his teens, had a heart attack. Frequently in poor health and under pharma care, a heart operation was performed at some point to correct the defect. KK continued in poor health which led mom to believe there were reasons to allege medical malpractice due to misdiagnoses. At that point the insurance company, doctors, lawyers and judges devised a plan to accuse Anne of Munchausen by proxy syndrome (MBPS), which is a relatively rare form of child abuse that involves the exaggeration or fabrication of illnesses or symptoms by a primary caretaker. In this way the medical malpractice issue is diverted by these conspirators — to escape their liability — by blaming Anne for all the medical problems that the “doctors” have been treating KK for – including misdiagnosis of K.K.’s underlying problems that cause his life-time discomfort, heart attack and heart operation. To help validate this ‘scheme’ perpetrated upon Anne, these conspirators find CPS folks to act upon their own allegations of “Munchausen by proxy syndrome,” to take custody of Anne’s children so as to support their own excuse that “Anne” is afflicted with Munchausen by proxy and responsible for K.K.’s medical issues, and thus escape medical malpractice liability. One thing leads to another and Anne is arrested for “contempt” when Anne makes a phone call, from the courtroom, to her mother who was waiting to drive Anne home after a court hearing related to custody. And last but not least, because of the demands in time and money placed upon Anne to resolve all the NONSENSE inflicted upon her… she lost her job and now her house is being foreclosed.
Aren’t these judges a real piece of work! As Anne asks me — If a doctor performs an operation and prescribes drugs for K.K. based upon ME having Munchausen by proxy, what psychiatric malady afflicts the doctor?
Now Anne is striking back and is asking for the REMOVAL, under WA Const. Art 4, Sec 9, of these corrupt judges who play god, make psychiatric diagnoses, establish court rules so as to arrest people and take their children, ignore the law … you know — how these despicable people use us citizens as their play-toys.
BRAVO ANNE! Keep us posted on any responses you get from Senator Steve O’Ban, WSBA #17265, and Representative Dick Muri.
3214 Crystal Springs Road West
University Place, WA 98466
Tuesday, January 21, 2015
Senator Steve O’Ban District 28 R
102 Irv Newhouse Building
PO Box 40428
Olympia, WA 98504-0428
Representative Dick Muri District 28 R
424 John L. O’Brien
P.O. Box 40600
Olympia, WA 98504-0600
Toll-free: (800) 562-6000
Dear Senator Steve O’Ban and Representative Dick Muri,
With this letter, I have delivered to you a copy of court documents and grievances that describes criminal conduct by members of WA State’s Judicial Branch. Those individual who hold judicial office and commit these crimes are 1) Judge James Orlando; 2) Judge Elizabeth Martin; 3) Commissioner Diana Lynn Kiesel and 4) Judge Kitty- Ann van Doorninck .
I demand that you exercise your power provided by WA Constitution, Article 4, Section 9. Therefore, you are to prepare a “joint resolution” for the removal of the individuals noted above and for the reasons provided by me and that which can be obtained by the courts including all documents, audio and “offers of proof” contained or referenced in the materials found on the included documents. This “joint resolution” that you are to prepare is to be submitted to the full house as stated in Article 4, Section 9.
This “joint resolution” shall NOT be submitted to any legislative committee or obstructed by any other person – including staff lawyers or lobbyists. The only “exception” to this prohibition is to insure the “joint resolution” properly and completely conveys the criminal conduct and evidentiary materials that support removal. The “joint resolution” shall be provided to each judicial official for their response as Article 4, Section 9 provides.
Additionally, I demand that you exercise your power provided by WA Constitution, Article 5, Sections 1 and 2. Therefore, you are to begin the process of conducting impeachment proceedings for the removal of the individuals noted above and for the reasons provided by me, including all documents, audio, and “offers of proof” contained or referenced in the materials found on the included documents.
I make these demands, because our “judicial branch” cannot sit in judgment of their own conduct. Only you, our ‘representative,’ can insure judicial officials understanding their obligations to the people. It is simple – governments derive their just powers from the consent of the governed, and are established to protect and maintain individual rights.
Last point… I have exercised my civic duty to report criminal conduct, by state officials, to my elected representatives who have the constitutional power to address and remedy these crimes being reported. The fact obligates you directly, not some surrogate, to take corrective action – it must be documented corrective action. If you do not take documented corrective action the principles of liability apply RCW 9A.08 and Title 18 USC Chapter 1 § 4
Anne Setsuko Giroux