STORY by CHRIS HUPY
“The germ of destruction of our nation is in the power of the judiciary, an irresponsible body – working like gravity by night and by day, gaining a little today and a little tomorrow, and advancing its noiseless step like a thief over the field of jurisdiction, until all shall render powerless the checks of one branch over the other and will become as venal and oppressive as the government from which we separated.”.
Thomas Jefferson, 1821
The suit details how the Judges denied the public access for years, likely prior to 1992, to secret meeting held at King County Courthouse generally in the Presiding Judges Courtroom on the 9th floor. Meeting were and are held once a month. Access to the secure data network was also provided to support the private corporation, but most importantly the private Corporation was provide exclusive and personal access to the Intellectual Property of the Judges themselves.
These Judges are being represented by the King County Prosecutor, Dan Satterberg at the public expense.
Wearing a black robe does not mean you are above Accountability.
MAY 9th, 2014 Filings-
This new Motion for an Administrative Ruling calls into question the impartiality of all Superior Court Judges to hear this matter, we’ll wait and see if SCSC Judge Michael Downes can find a unbiased and non prejudicial Judge.
May 15th, 2014 Filings-
In this response the King County Prosecutor argues that the “Appearance of Fairness Doctrine” applies only AFTER judgment.
May 16th, 2014 Filings-
In the Mandatory Judicial Notice the Washington State Attorney General (who also is the private lawyer for ALL of the defendants) states the AG’s office will NOT intervene in this case!
May 19th, 2014 Administrative Ruling-
Plaintiffs motion for an Administrative Ruling for Preassignment of a Judicial Officer prevails in face of opposition by the King County Prosecutor. Presiding Judge Michael Downes appointed Judge George N. Bowden.