Attached is an audio snippet from a motion hearing “Scheidler v Executive Director, Commission on Judicial Conduct and Associate Director, WSBA, et. al.” at which I objected to a WA lawyer, under RCW 2.28.030 from acting as judge when the judge is ‘directly interested’ in the subject matter of the case. Also noted in my pleading is the ‘ethical requirement’ that states judges shall disqualify themselves under the Code of Judicial conduct CJC 2.11, when a judges ‘family’ is interested in the subject matter of the case. In this case the Judge’s son is a lawyer.
Clearly, a judge has a VITAL interest at stake, as the Commission on Judicial Conduct has the absolute power to remove the judge from his bench without consequence in the way the CJC achieves the judges removal. (See RCW 2.64.080 privilege from suit). Additionally, in this case, Judge Keith Harper’s son is a lawyer… hence his son’s interest is involved in that the WSBA is a party and the judge’s son is susceptible to the same retribution if the judge rules against the WSBA.
Please listen to how Judge Keith Harper addresses me and tells me to go find a venue on the moon or MARS when I try to discuss these conflicts judges have in matters concerning the judicial system and by law he must disqualify.
Needless to say, anyone who recognizes how the “legal establishment” has commandeered our ‘justice system’ and uses this ‘complete power’ to make ANY decision they want solely for their own enrichment — PLEASE GET INVOLVED! PLEASE PASS THIS SITE TO ALL YOU KNOW! PLEASE CONTACT YOUR REPRESENTATIVES AND VOICE YOUR CONCERN.
…. AND PLEASE “like what we do” by noting your approval on the social sites noted below.
THANKS TO ALL WHO HAVE WRITTEN ME WITH ENCOURAGEMENT AND ESPECIALLY MY THANKS TO BRUCE GAMBILL, CAMEO MASSEY AND JOHN WORTHINGTON FOR ALL YOU DO TO HELP MOVE THIS ISSUE INTO THE PUBLIC ARENA.